🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed order, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to implement a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that may create several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, handed down on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to set aside a district court's block that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disrupting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its action.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had probably sorted voters based on their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the new maps. It had instructed the state to revert to the boundaries established after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Opposition

In a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's ruling. She argued that it disregarded the work of the district court, noting that its opinion was actually authored by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its boosted favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a violation of the law of the land.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Struggle

The court's action is part of a countrywide fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Typically, redistricting occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that could add a number of additional conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have pushed back with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Reactions

The Texas attorney general welcomed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees representation aligned with Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

Conversely, Democratic representatives decried the outcome. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

Another top House leader argued the court had yet again damaged its standing by upholding a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.